Pick your role, paste the job description if you have it, and start. It takes about fifteen minutes. Nothing you type or say leaves this page.
Voice needs Chrome or Edge. If it does not work, or you would rather type, typing is exactly as good here.
Press and hold, or press once to start and again to stop. You can also just type below.
Not everything. Three. These come from the patterns across all six of your answers.
This prototype forgets you when you close the tab. The real product remembers, and the useful sentence is the one it can only say on your third visit — “you have now finished eleven answers without a measurable result in any of them.” That is the thing a free chat assistant structurally cannot tell you.
You have done the job. You can explain it to a colleague in thirty seconds. Then you sit down in front of a stranger who has your CV in front of them, and it comes out as a muddle.
That is not a knowledge problem. It is a rehearsal problem. Reading a list of common questions does not fix it, because reading is not speaking. The only thing that fixes it is saying the answer badly, being told exactly why it was weak, and saying it again.
That is all this is. Six questions, out loud, for the job you are actually going for.
Paste the job title and the description. That is the only thing we need. Your resume is optional — paste it or skip it.
Six questions, one at a time. Hold the button and talk. If your microphone is blocked or you would rather type, typing works exactly as well.
You get your own words back with one line marked. Change that one thing and answer again. The second attempt is usually noticeably better.
Not a score. Not a grade. Your own sentence, quoted back, with a note about why it worked or why it did not.
“I pulled the last six months of ticket data before I said anything.”
You led with evidence instead of opinion. Keep this as your opening line.
“…and eventually they came around.”
No result and no argument. What changed their mind? That is the whole story and you skipped it.
Name the specific argument that landed, then say what happened afterwards.
“I pulled six months of ticket data, showed that [ADD YOUR REAL NUMBER] of escalations came from one flow, and they approved the rebuild that quarter.”
The bracket is deliberate. We will not invent a number you did not say.
See a full sample report · How it works
Most practice tools hand you the same forty questions everybody else gets. A generic question produces a generic answer, and a generic answer is exactly what loses you the job.
| A generic question | A question built from your posting |
|---|---|
| “Tell me about a project you are proud of.” | “This role owns the reporting handoff to sales. Tell me about a time a team ignored your numbers.” |
| “What is your greatest weakness?” | “The posting asks for someone comfortable with ambiguity. Describe a project where nobody had decided what success meant.” |
| “Why do you want to work here?” | “They mention a migration twice. What would your first thirty days on a migration look like?” |
Eighteen roles have their own question set inside the tool. These three also have a full written guide.
Some jobs are measured in numbers and some are not. For an analyst or a salesperson, an answer without a figure in it is a weak answer, and this says so. For a nurse or a teacher, demanding a percentage would be bad advice — so for those roles it asks how the situation actually ended instead. Same engine, different standard, because the jobs are not the same.
There are cheaper and more expensive options than this, and for some people they are the right answer. Here is the honest comparison.
| Option | What it costs | What it does well | Where it falls short |
|---|---|---|---|
| A free AI chat assistant | Free | Genuinely good. It will ask you questions and critique your answers right now, with no signup. | It is built to be agreeable, so it rarely tells you that you are not ready. It forgets you between sessions. And asked to improve your answer, it will happily add a result you never mentioned. |
| A human interview coach | Roughly $150–300 an hour | Better than any software, if you find a good one. | Expensive, needs booking, and you usually get one session rather than six attempts at the same answer. |
| Reading a list of questions | Free | Useful for knowing what is coming. | Reading is not speaking. It does nothing for the part that actually fails. |
| Straight With Me | Free to try, then $9 once | Remembers what you keep getting wrong across sessions. Tells you plainly when an answer had nothing in it. Never invents a fact you did not say. | It is software. It cannot read the room, and it does not know the company. |
Yes. One full six-question session, no card, no trial countdown. If it is useful you can buy a pass for $9. If it is not, close the tab.
No, but you should. Typing works everywhere in the product and the feedback is just as detailed. The reason to speak is that speaking is the skill that fails in the room.
Then you type. It is not a downgraded experience — the text path was built first.
No, and be careful with anything that claims to. Hiring depends on the other candidates, the budget and the timing, none of which we can see.
Your answers are kept so that we can show you your own pattern over time — that is the whole point of coming back. You can delete any session, or your whole account, whenever you like.
That is one of the cases it helps most. You know the work; the difficulty is saying it quickly under pressure. Practising out loud with specific feedback is exactly the right drill.